Art ielts writing task 2

Some people think that art should be taught in schools. Others believe that it is a waste of time and resources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Benefits of Teaching Art in Schools Counterarguments Against Teaching Art in Schools

Art Education Provides Students with a Well-Rounded Education That Includes Creative and Expressive Skills

Reason: Art education fosters creativity and self-expression, complementing the academic skills learned in other subjects. This combination ensures students develop both intellectually and emotionally.

Example: students involved in art projects may demonstrate improved emotional intelligence and creativity, which are crucial for personal and professional development.

Result: Students who receive a well-rounded education that includes art are more likely to become well-adjusted individuals with diverse skills and perspectives.

 Resources for Art Education Can Be Limited and Expensive

Reason: Allocating resources to art education can be costly, requiring funds for supplies, equipment, and specialized teachers. This financial burden may divert funds from other critical subjects.

Example: A school facing budget constraints might have to choose between purchasing new science lab equipment or funding an art program. Prioritizing art education could mean fewer resources for subjects that are seen as more directly linked to academic achievement and career readiness.

Result: As a consequence, important subjects like math and science may suffer from underfunding, potentially impacting the quality of education in these areas.
Art Classes Can Be a Way for Students to Explore Their Interests and Develop Their Passions

Reason: Art classes offer students the opportunity to discover and nurture their talents and interests that might not be evident in other subjects.

Example: A student who excels in visual arts may find their passion through painting or drawing classes, leading them to pursue a career in graphic design or fine arts.

Result: By exploring their interests in art classes, students can develop lifelong passions and career paths that are fulfilling and rewarding.

 Some People Believe That Art Education Is Not Essential for Students to Succeed in Life and Their Careers

Reason: There is a perception that art education does not directly contribute to essential life skills or career success, especially in a job market that highly values technical and practical skills.

Example: Employers in fields such as engineering, finance, and healthcare often prioritize candidates with strong backgrounds in STEM subjects over those with artistic skills.

Result: This belief can lead to a de-emphasis on art education, with schools focusing more on subjects that are traditionally seen as more beneficial for future employment.
Art Can Help Students to Develop Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills That Can Be Applied in Other Areas of Their Lives

Reason: Engaging in artistic activities requires students to think creatively, solve problems, and make decisions, skills that are transferable to other academic and life situations.

Example: A student working on a complex art project must plan, execute, and adapt their approach, which enhances their ability to tackle challenges in subjects like science or math.

Result: Students who develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills through art are better equipped to handle academic and real-world challenges, leading to overall success.

 Time Spent on Art Classes Could Be Better Used for Other Subjects That Are Seen as More Important, Such as Maths or Science

Reason: Time is a limited resource in education, and there is a need to prioritize subjects that have a more direct impact on academic success and standardized test scores.

Example: A school might reduce art classes to allocate more time for math and science lessons in order to improve students’ performance on standardized tests and meet educational benchmarks.

Result: This focus can lead to improved test scores and academic performance in core subjects, but it may also result in a less balanced education that neglects the development of creativity and self-expression.
Art Can Promote Cultural Understanding and Appreciation for Different Perspectives

Reason: Art education exposes students to various cultures and historical contexts, fostering an appreciation for diversity and multiple viewpoints.

Example: Learning about different art forms from around the world helps students understand and respect cultural differences, promoting empathy and global awareness.

Result: This cultural understanding contributes to creating a more inclusive and respectful school environment and prepares students to thrive in a diverse society.

 Art Classes May Not Appeal to All Students, and Some May Feel Forced to Participate in Something They Have No Interest In

Reason: Not all students are interested in or have a talent for art, and mandatory art classes can feel like a burden to those who do not enjoy them.

Example: A student who excels in math and science but has no interest in art may feel frustrated and disengaged when required to take art classes, potentially affecting their overall school experience and performance in other subjects.

Result: Forcing uninterested students to participate in art classes can lead to disengagement and a negative attitude towards school, rather than fostering a positive and inclusive learning environment.
Art Classes Can Provide a Sense of Community and Belonging for Students Who May Not Excel in Traditional Academic Subjects

Reason: Art classes offer a platform for students who may struggle in other academic areas to shine, fostering a sense of achievement and belonging.

Example: A student who finds it difficult to excel in subjects like math or science may discover their strengths in art, boosting their confidence and self-esteem.

Result: By participating in art classes, these students feel valued and included, which enhances their overall school experience and promotes a positive attitude towards learning.

 

 The Value of Art Is Subjective and Varies from Person to Person, Making It Difficult to Measure Its Impact on Student Success

Reason: Unlike subjects with clear metrics for success, such as math and science, the impact of art education is more subjective and harder to quantify.

Example: While one student might find profound personal and emotional growth through art, another might see it as a less important part of their education with little tangible benefit.

Result: The subjective nature of art makes it challenging to justify its inclusion in a curriculum that is increasingly focused on measurable outcomes and standardized achievements. This can lead to debates about the allocation of time and resources for art education in schools.

In recent years, street art has become increasingly popular in many cities around the world. Some people consider it a form of vandalism, while others see it as a legitimate form of artistic expression. What is your opinion on this?

Cách viết mở bài writing task 2
Arguments in favour of street art Arguments against government funding for the arts
Street Art Can Bring Colour and Life to Otherwise Drab and Uninteresting Public Spaces

Reason: Street art can transform bland, grey urban areas into vibrant and engaging environments that attract attention and bring joy to residents and visitors. Murals and graffiti can brighten up walls, underpasses, and other neglected spaces, turning them into local landmarks.
Result: These transformed spaces can foster a sense of pride and ownership among community members, improving the overall aesthetic and atmosphere of the area.

Street Art Can Be Seen as Vandalism or Defacement of Public Property

Reason: Street art, especially when done without permission, is often viewed as an illegal act of vandalism. Property owners and city officials may see it as damaging to buildings and public spaces.

Example: In many cities, graffiti on public transportation, buildings, or monuments is considered a criminal offense. For instance, in HCMC …..

Result: This perception of street art as vandalism can lead to legal consequences for the artists, as well as negative reactions from the community who may see the artwork as a violation of their environment rather than a beautification effort.
Street Art Can Be a Form of Public Art That Is Accessible to Everyone, Regardless of Their Socioeconomic Status

Reason: Unlike traditional art galleries and museums, which may charge admission fees or be located in exclusive areas, street art is free and available to anyone who passes by.

Result: This accessibility helps democratize art, making it an inclusive experience that can be enjoyed by a diverse audience.

 Street Art Can Be Offensive or Inappropriate

Reason: Not all street art is created with the intention of beautifying or positively impacting the community. Some pieces may include profanity, hate speech, or other forms of objectionable content, which can be offensive to the public.

Example: For example, graffiti that includes offensive language or symbols might need to be removed immediately to maintain public decency.

Result: Offensive street art can cause distress and division among community members, undermining the potential positive impact of public art and leading to calls for stricter regulations and enforcement against unauthorized street art.
Street Art Can Be Used to Convey Political or Social Messages That Might Not Otherwise Be Heard or Seen

Reason: Street art provides a platform for artists to express political and social viewpoints, raising awareness about important issues in a public and accessible manner.
Result: These artworks can spark conversations and bring attention to causes that might not receive mainstream media coverage, influencing public opinion and inspiring action.

 Street Art Can Be Expensive to Remove or Clean Up

Reason: When street art is created using permanent materials like spray paint, it can be costly and labor-intensive to remove, putting a financial burden on property owners and local governments.

Result: These expenses can strain municipal budgets and divert funds from other important public services, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure maintenance. Additionally, the repeated need to clean up graffiti can create frustration and resentment among property owners and taxpayers.

Many people argue that government funding for the arts is a waste of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?

Arguments for Government Funding for the Arts Arguments again Government Funding for the Arts
Cultural Enrichment:

  • Argument: Government funding for the arts enriches cultural heritage and national identity.
  • Explanation: The arts play a crucial role in preserving and promoting cultural traditions, which fosters a shared sense of history and identity among citizens.
  • Development: For example, countries like France and Italy, which invest heavily in the arts, have a rich cultural landscape that attracts millions of tourists annually. This cultural tourism not only boosts the economy but also strengthens national pride and unity, demonstrating the broader societal benefits of supporting the arts.
 Priority of Essential Services:

  • Argument: Government resources should be prioritized for essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
  • Explanation: In times of economic constraints, it is vital to allocate funds to sectors that directly impact citizens’ well-being and basic needs.
  • Development: For example, during economic crises, countries like Greece have had to cut arts funding to focus on healthcare and social services. Ensuring that essential services are adequately funded guarantees the overall health and stability of the population.
Economic Benefits:

  • Argument: The arts sector contributes significantly to the economy through job creation and tourism.
  • Explanation: Investment in the arts generates employment opportunities across various fields such as performing arts, visual arts, and arts education, and also attracts tourism revenue.
  • Development: For instance, the UK’s creative industries contributed £111.7 billion to the economy in 2018. This substantial economic impact shows that funding the arts stimulates economic growth and provides financial returns that can be reinvested into other public services, supporting a thriving economy.
 Private Sector Support:

  • Argument: The arts can be funded by private donations, sponsorships, and ticket sales, reducing the need for government intervention.
  • Explanation: The private sector has the capacity to support the arts through philanthropy and corporate sponsorship, which can alleviate the financial burden on taxpayers.
  • Development: Many museums and galleries in the United States, for instance, are sustained through private donations and corporate partnerships. This model encourages public-private collaborations, ensuring that the arts can thrive without heavy reliance on government funding.
Educational Value:

  • Argument: Exposure to the arts enhances educational outcomes and fosters creativity in students.
  • Explanation: Arts education helps students develop critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and emotional intelligence, which are essential for personal and professional success.
  • Development: Studies indicate that students engaged in arts education perform better academically and exhibit higher levels of creativity. By funding the arts in schools, governments can cultivate a more innovative and adaptable workforce, prepared to meet the challenges of the future.
 Subjective Value of Art:

  • Argument: Art is subjective, and funding decisions may not reflect the diverse preferences of the entire population.
  • Explanation: What is considered valuable or worthwhile art varies greatly among individuals and communities, leading to potential disagreements over the use of public funds.
  • Development: Controversial art projects that receive government funding can provoke public outcry and debates about the misuse of taxpayer money. This contention underscores the challenge of making funding decisions that satisfy a diverse populace, suggesting that the government should focus on more universally accepted expenditures.

Tham gia nhóm gia sư IELTS để luyện tiếng Anh nhé

Categorized in:

Writing task 2,